Giveaways & Sweepstakes in the Digital Age: Are They Still Effective?

Today, Diet Coke launched a sweepstakes as part of their “Drink it Up” campaign that encourages consumers to submit the name and story of their hero during the pandemic (Adams, 2020). Whether this is someone’s parent, best friend, or a first responder, the selected winners of the sweepstakes will receive a year’s supply of Diet Coke (Adams, 2020).

Despite the caring nature of Diet Coke’s rewarding campaign, one major question arises from this: are marketing methods that involve giveaways or sweepstakes even effective anymore? With a majority of marketing efforts swarming to social media in recent years, there has been a noticeable decline in radio and television-based sweepstakes (Vargo, 2016). Whereas social media gives companies access to engage directly with consumers and generate social buzz, sweepstakes have little impact and are rarely talked about because they only involve a small group of winners, right? Wrong. Giveaways and sweepstakes are actually one of the most effective ways to increase consumer word-of-mouth (WOM) due to experience with a product, which ultimately leads to behavioral residue and reciprocity (Cialdini, 2001; Berger & Schwartz, 2011; Berger, 2013).

Experience with The Product

Giveaways and sweepstakes that involve giving consumers a free or discounted product, such as Diet Coke’s free one-year supply, force the winners to hold and experience the product in-person. Rather than basing their opinions of a product on online reviews or the physical appearance of the product, sweepstakes winners develop stronger and more reliable opinions by actually using the product. Physical, first-hand use of a product provides consumers with more in-depth information about the product that is crucial in creating a decision (Cialdini, 2001). As a result, they are more likely to share their opinions and make recommendations to family and friends, spreading additional WOM about the product that would’ve otherwise not have been shared (Berger & Schwartz, 2011).

Berger and Schwartz (2011) found the presence of a 20 percent increase in WOM when winners of sweepstakes experienced the actual product. Vargo (2016) later expanded upon Berger and Schwartz’s findings by acknowledging a similar increase of WOM communication, but through social media, also referred to as electronic word-of-mouth.

Behavioral Residue

One result of first-hand experience with a product is known as behavioral residue, or the distant traces of consumer behaviors caused by an earlier experience or, in this case, marketing effort (Berger, 2013). Berger (2013) discusses behavioral residue throughout the “Public” section of his book, Contagious: Why Things Catch On. As the class knows, this section involves the action of associating a brand image or personality with a product.

With its “Drink it Up” campaign, Diet Coke’s underlining goal is most likely to associate the boosted self-esteem of praising a hero with the Diet Coke product. Whether or not someone wins the sweepstake and gets to experience the product, simply sending the story with a Diet Coke logo on the page will engage that association with the brand. Nonetheless, this association doesn’t end when the sweepstakes concludes; but instead continues and later reappears as a trigger of similar feelings with future engagements with the brand (Berger, 2013).

Reciprocity

When one person gives someone else a gift or helps when the other person is in need, how does the receiver generally respond? Showing appreciation or returning the favor are typical responses that are ingrained in most cultures. Sweepstakes or giveaways play off of these natural tendencies of appreciation by assuming that giving a gift to a selected consumer will either result in increased positive WOM about the product, or increased future sales of the product (Cialdini, 2001). After all, a year’s supply of Diet Coke is just that, a year’s supply. It won’t last someone their entire life. Therefore, Diet Coke hopes that this kind gesture of a limited, but free, supply of Diet Coke will lead to a loyal purchaser after the year ends.

Although marketing channels have drastically changed within the past decade, giveaways and sweepstakes are still a reliable marketing technique that can even be integrated with social media campaigns. The ability for giveaways to get the product directly in front of consumers, create a positive association between the consumer and the product, and ensure a future loyal consumer all while being a cost-effective option for companies makes them a powerhouse marketing technique.

References

Adams, P. (2020, October 16). Diet Coke lets people reward unsung pandemic heroes with a year of free soda. Retrieved from https://www.marketingdive.com/news/diet-coke-lets-people-reward-unsung-pandemic-heroes-with-a-year-of-free-sod/587191/

Berger, J., & Schwartz, E. (2011). What Drives Immediate and Ongoing Word of Mouth? Journal of Marketing Research, 48(5), 869–880. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.5.869

Berger, J. (2013). Contagious : Why Things Catch On  (1st Simon & Schuster hardcover ed.). Simon & Schuster.

Cialdini, R. (2001). Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 79(9), 72–.

Vargo, C. (2016). Toward a Tweet Typology: Contributory Consumer Engagement with Brand Messages by Content Type. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 16(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2016.1208125

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

The Art of Collaboration

In the world of social media, influencers are an everyday occurrence. Brands partner with celebrities or traditional influencers to advertise their product in the hopes that their followers will see an endorsement and end up buying the product because their favorite follow did. But is this different than a brand tapping a celebrity for a collaboration? 

In the past month alone, Bad Bunny has partnered with Crocs to create his custom pair (that sold out in hours) and McDonald’s tapped Travis Scott to create his favorite McDonald’s meal (a Quarter Pounder with cheese, bacon, and lettuce; fries with BBQ sauce; and a Sprite if you were wondering) that was then sold for a limited time at limited locations. You can buy those products at McDonald’s any day of the week at any  location, but yet fans clamored to restaurants after the “drop” was announced. Why? Because if you eat a Quarter Pounder with cheese, bacon and lettuce, fries with BBQ sauce and a Sprite, you might just become a little more like Travis Scott. 

Regarding the Bad Bunny x Crocs collab, you can get a pair of Crocs any day of the week online and at various retail locations. Crocs aren’t even considered cool or trendy, but yet when Bad Bunny announced his custom pair, they were out the door. The power of influence and the art of collaboration cannot be underestimated. Brands spend millions of dollars paying celebrities for these collaborations in the hopes that their reach and influence will add to the ultimate bottom line in sales. 

The difference between paying an influencer to endorse a product on their feed and working with celebrities for custom product and content is you get a touch of that celebrity in the message. Yes, this influencer may like this new face wash, but they didn’t have anything to do with the making of it. Travis Scott and Bad Bunny (and their vast teams of people) sat down with McDonald’s and Crocs to hash out what the product would be and why. This influence far outreaches an endorsement, which the celebrity collaborator knows and justifies the multi-figure deal they get paid. 

Are you more inclined to purchase a product that an influencer endorses or do you jump on the celebrity collaboration ticket?

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Women Warriors Make Your Mark!

Yesterday marked the first day of Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation hearings. As I half-listened to the remarks in between conference calls, I sat in awe of the importance of this day. I saw remarkable can-do women from both sides of the aisle, who have left and will continue to leave their indelible marks on this nation and thus history. Don’t worry; this post is not about politics; instead, it’s about lifting up women who are perfectly imperfect, who love their careers and work fiercely to achieve their professional goals, then go home to be a mom (and wife) and make no apologies for it! This. Is. Great! It is what we need to see. Now I ask myself, rather than being afraid, why wasn’t I more aware of women warriors like these ten years ago when I became a mom?

We All Start Somewhere!

A daughter to immigrants, I was the first in my family to go to college. Like my parents, I was determined to take advantage of every opportunity that came my way. I came from the generation where my female predecessors and college professors told me I could do anything, and I believed them! I started my career trailblazing my way through professional sports. At the time, this was unheard of. (Jeannie Buss had yet to fulfill her destiny as the first female owner to win an NBA championship.) Flying in private jets with A-list athletes, creating brands, negotiating lucrative deals, and living out of a suitcase while staying in the best hotels in the hottest cities–it was awesome! I was the female version of Jerry McGuire, but deep down, I knew it couldn’t last. Don’t get me wrong; I am not complaining – I had fun and love being a mom now, but as a newlywed, I secretly knew that I would one day want a family, and this funtastically remarkable career I built, would have to come to an end. And it did. The reality is, at the time, no one did what I did, and I had no one to turn to for advice, so I took the road I thought I had to, I quit. I mean, what kind of crazy person walks away from all that adventure? At that time, I didn’t know about Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and there was certainly no Amy Coney Barret. So yes, I became that crazy person that stepped away from a position I built, in a field I loved, to be a mom.

 

Oh Yea? Watch Me!

After taking some time off to be a mom, I was ready to get my career back. Realistically, I knew I would have to start over because my family is my priority, and my former life wasn’t going to work. It took some trial and error to find the right position. I worked for one woman who’d regularly say, “call the babysitter, I need you to work late.” That job lasted four months. I then worked for another company that abruptly decided; travel will be a big part of my job after being told no travel. That job lasted six months. Then suddenly, I had an epiphany and realized my worth. I knocked on Corporate America’s door, and fortunately, they answered. After months of interviews and evaluations, I was a top candidate at two fortune 100 companies and received offers days apart. It was here where I learned my worth and can relate to the values I saw in abundance on Capital Hill. I am tenacious, creative, smart, and incredibly hard-working. I vow to move the chains and have no quit until my work is done! However, I also want to tuck my son in every night and hold his hand while I walk him to school every morning, and missing his games is not an option. Both companies accepted my terms, but one embraced family more. Still, it remains that I take advantage of every opportunity and create new ones. Like the strong, powerful women I see on TV, I make no apologies for being a mom. Like those women, I will leave my indelible mark because that is who I am.

 

References:

https://www.moms.com/amy-coney-barretts-children/

https://www.moms.com/ruth-bader-ginsburg-raising-two-kids/

https://forbesbooks.com/women-outperforming-in-leadership-roles/

Precious Moments!
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

“Get Woke, Go Broke?” Finding a Scapegoat for Suffering Ratings

Despite having two juxtaposed, inherent natures, sports and politics have been gradually intertwined over the past 60 years as athletes became elevated to celebrity status as broadcast technology made exposure to sports increasingly common and powerful. Iconic images from the advent of the fight for civil rights have paved the way for athletes in today’s sociopolitical climate to take a stand and speak out like their legendary predecessors.

Although the pandemic has slowed down and shaken the process and normalcy of the traditional American pro-sports model, athletes and leagues around the country have found ways to take a stand. The NBA began speaking out about the demand for police and justice reform through jersey modifications and featuring on court logos and league branding. MLB and The NHL followed suit by using similar tactics through on field branding, social media strategy, and player driven conversations and initiatives. The Milwaukee Bucks of The NBA then led a “walk out” by refusing to play a playoff game in order to drive conversations about issues “bigger than sports.” In an unprecedented time for American sports, athletes from every major league in the United States sat out and refused to play sports to bring attention to issue that not only were important to the athletes but important to humanity.

The actions were generally received well on Twitter and other social media platforms. However, the ratings for nearly every sport league has been recently trending downwards at a concerning rate. The most outspoken of the leagues however has taken a massive hit as the NBA Finals are down 48% from the prior year. Many outspoken sports personality columnists are citing a “go woke go broke” narrative that assigns this rating drop to a discord with the majority of the sports audience wanting sports and politics to be autonomous and in turn “boycotting” watching any sports as a counter protest.

Clay Travis, founder of Outkick.com and host of the Fox Sports Radio show Outkick the Coverageregularly criticizes the NBA

A 2020 Harris Poll cites that 38% of fans think the NBA is too political yet I was not able to find any other recent polls that cite a strong, bipartisan disconnect in sports and politics that suggest that a wide boycott is to blame for ratings sinking to a historic low. A Washington Post poll demonstrates a possible argument for the opposite as it found that over 60% of the sampled Americans believe that athletes should be able to use their platforms to speak out about social justice. However, although individuals may agree with athletes right to use their platform, they may also decide to use their right to direct their time elsewhere as a statement of protest. There is no convincing data with proper sampling that measures this sentiment. For now, the ratings are the only objective empirical evidence available.

A few explanations for the ratings drop have been offered but still do not hold water as a cause but rather are more representative of correlation. For example, the pandemic has allowed for all four major American sports leagues to have games at the same time. This unprecedented scheduling can and appears to have led to ratings cannibalization between fans of multiple sports. It is also true that all leagues have suffered ratings drops despite high stakes, well-paired matchups. However, it does not explain why the NBA, the most socially active league has suffered the largest drop in ratings.

The ratings situation within the NBA has shocked even Adam Silver, the commissioner of the league as the finals matchup this year features the most popular, dynamic player in the league playing for the largest fan base and market in the league. Although the sports comeback should in theory invigorate a starved fan base the new, forced formats for the leagues may have created a sentiment of irrelevance as fans deem these make up games “fake seasons” and in turn decide to not watch something they feel does not matter.

The only proper path to deciding whether or not political discourse has contributed to the collapse of the ratings for sports is to continue to analyze the trends in relation to league statements, actions, and outspokenness regarding politics. Personally, I feel that the ratings will bounce back for all leagues despite the possible public disdain for harmless and rightful call to social actions. Either way, the ratings hits have definitely cast doubt on sports business models and are leaving PR specialists, marketers, and strategist looking for a scapegoat to kill off to bring TV revenue back to the standard. Are politics the true root of the ratings collapse or are strategists and pundits looking for an inflammatory scapegoat?

Reference Links

https://sports.yahoo.com/2020-nba-finals-ratings-historically-202732628.html

https://sports.yahoo.com/why-the-narrative-about-declining-nba-ratings-is-wrong-172402656.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2020/09/10/poll-nfl-anthem-protests/

https://www.si.com/nba/cavaliers/nba-amico/basketball-playoffs-television-ratings

https://theharrispoll.com/poll-38-of-sports-fans-say-nba-is-too-political-as-reason-they-are-watching-less/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenhausen/2020/09/02/poll-38-of-sports-fans-say-nba-is-too-political-for-reason-why-they-are-watching-less/#644ec9b07aac

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Did COVID-19 Expose That Fashion Is Not Important?

Many would say that the leaves changing color is the tell-tale sign that fall has arrived. However people like myself in the fashion industry would beg to differ. For a fashion industry professional the real mark of the change in season is the start of New York Fashion Week. I would go as far as to say the excitement I personally get the day before it begins is similar to what Christmas morning feels like. Many of us in the industry wake up at the crack of dawn (depending on the show schedule) and religiously refresh our browsers to catch a glimpse into what is new and fresh on the runway for the upcoming season.

NYFW this year like many others things was very different due to COVID. Some of the shows that did go on had no audiences and hardly any media. Many shows were cancelled as some designers opted out of bringing their collections to the runway deeming it not only unsafe but not important during such an unprecidented time. This then lead me to question the validity of my own personal disappointment after viewing what I felt was a horribly watered down “COVID-19 friendly” NYFW. A question came across my mind that I never thought would as I have loved fashion since I can remember and feel it is so important to my identity. The question that popped in my head was “has COVID exposed that fashion actually is not that important?!” *gasps* The little girl who would put on fashion shows with her barbies every night (aka me) is shaking right now at the thought of it!

After taking a sip of water, apologizing to my younger self, and realizing I was being unreasonable I started to dig into how far from the truth that is. In fact it is actually the opposite in my opinion. Fashion has a way of adjusting to whatever is going on in the world to make itself relevant and important. This lead me to look into how brands are communicating to the consumer during the pandemic. Brands are telling the consumer yes they know there is a pandemic that is causing everyone to stay in the house and oddly make banana bread every night, but that does not mean they cannot look good while doing it. Brands are telling consumers that they know their offices are closed and work from home is the new normal, but again they can still look good while telling their co-worker they’re on mute during a Zoom meeting.

The message has changed across many brands to really cater and adjust to this new normal. When visiting the websites of my favorite brands the common theme is not only comfort, but also convenience. Brands have went above and beyond like they never have before to ensure consumers know whatever they want is available to them with the swipe of a finger. It just lead to me think about how many packages I had delivered to me each day during the lockdown. The excitement I would get unboxing an outfit that at the time I had no clue when I would ever be able to wear was so thrilling. I also thought about how I masked up and did curbside pickup for a certain outfit I wanted for my first Zoom meeting after returning from furlough. All of these instances and adjustments the fashion industry has made during the pandemic is proof to me that they are important. Although some brands did suffer and either closed or filed for bankruptcy (Barneys, Lane Bryant, J.Crew, etc) I personally do not think the financial aspect of the industry is always an indication of its importance.

Fashion in my opinion is important because it is something that can alter how you feel. I even have to say the pandemic made me personally appreciate fashion even more. During such a scary time fashion was something that distracted me from worrying about the unknown future. Also let’s be honest the slash in prices and constant sells due to the tanking of economy may have contributed as well. However I think that fashion has solidified itself as an industry that can adjust and is here to stay even during a pandemic.

Gerard, B. (2020, May 12). So, Like, Is Fashion Week Canceled? Retrieved October 11, 2020, from https://stylecaster.com/is-fashion-week-cancelled-september-2020/

Segal, L. (2020). Every Household-Name Brand Filing for Bankruptcy or Closing Stores Amid the Coronavirus Pandemic. Retrieved October 11, 2020, from https://people.com/lifestyle/stores-restaurants-shutting-down-going-bankrupt-coronavirus/

Wylie, C. (2020, May 21). How is coronavirus impacting fashion brands? Retrieved October 11, 2020, from https://www.thedrum.com/opinion/2020/05/21/how-coronavirus-impacting-fashion-brands

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

Look How Big Has League of Legends Become

Before games like Dota and League of Legends became popular, our familiar e-sports games are generally war3, StarCraft, Red Alert, and Age of Empires. In the early years, these were regular projects of WCG. When Sky won two championships in the WCG, how many people took the honor of playing well in Warcraft.

And why are all these games in decline, gradually losing to League of Legends?

League of Legends launched 12 years ago over the summer of 2008. Now has turned into one of the most successful MOBA games in the industry. 

In 2009, Riot earned an estimated $1.29 million in revenue according to estimates by SuperData. The following year, that revenue was up to $17.25 million, according to SuperData. And in 2011, Riot Games revenue rocketed to more than $85 million. That same year Chinese gaming and internet giant Tencent Holdings purchased 97 percent of the company for $400 million.

In 2011, Riot began to try to get into e-sports. In June, during the Dreamhack Summer Games in Sweden, it hosted the first “League of Legends” Global Championship (S1), attracting more than 1.6 million spectators.

In 2012, Riot decided to hold the S2 finals in Los Angeles. However, when the Chinese team WE and Counter Logic Gaming Europe playing for about 50 minutes, they suddenly suffered a disconnection on the spot, leaving both teams dumbfounded. The match could not continue, so CLG EU and WE had to rematch, and then they rematched again due to disconnection. The process lasted for a full 7 hours, and finally, Roit had to stop and host a rematch the next day.

Merrill admitted that the match accident was like “tragedy, but a great rallying cry for the company to get better, to figure out how to solve these things”. 

Years later, as “League of Legends” continued to be popular, the game’s problems continued to appear. As early as 2012, Riot realized that some players’ behavior insulting others in the game was a problem and even formed a Team Play Behavior group led by scientists.

Merrill believes that one of the reasons why Riot can be successful is that they are willing to listen to the voice of the players, whether they are enthusiastic supporters of the game or outspoken critics. At the same time, Riot also needs to be aware of which of the players’ suggestions are wrong.

Most of the players’ brand experience with League of Legends is excellent, and Riot’s consistency of having conversations with its players plays a major part in such successful communication. Riot keeps bringing new champion, creating videos to share the new champion’s insights before releasing it, and even created a band called KDA with League of Legends’ champion.

KDA band turned out to be so successful, even nonplayers started to pay attention to this band, thus League of Legends. With a creative mind, Riot was able to keep creating trends over social media and engage with its players. Riot was able to bring its element outside of the gaming world to reach a more general public.

Interface of League of Legends

 Each year players are so excited during League of Legends’ World Championship to see what Riot can bring. Last year was a song and KDA band, this year, Riot is still able to host its world championship in China in the Shanghai Stadium with live audiences.

There are many perspectives that I didn’t mention in this post, but the fact that each champion in League of Legend has it is own background story. It’s also very intriguing to a lot of people. So please join me in the summoner’s rift.

References

Champion insights: Samira – League of legends. (n.d.). Retrieved October 11, 2020, from https://na.leagueoflegends.com/en-us/news/dev/champion-insights-samira/

Crecente, B. (2019, October 27). League of Legends is now 10 years old. This is the story of its birth. https://www.washingtonpost.com/video-games/2019/10/27/league-legends-is-now-years-old-this-is-story-its-birth/?tdsourcetag=s_pctim_aiomsg.

Lim, W. (2018, August 9). Legendary: The story of league of legends from 2009–2018. Medium. https://medium.com/@williamlim3/legendary-the-story-of-league-of-legends-from-2009-2018-68c578a0563f


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Comments Off on Look How Big Has League of Legends Become

Overcoming IG Algorithms

Mica Andreea, Dribble.com

Social media platforms are notoriously known for constantly switching up layouts and styles and Instagram is no stranger to that.

If you’ve been on the Instagram platform a while you might remember a time where your posts were receiving more likes than they currently are. And if you are IG obsessed (guilty on occasions!), then this might bug you.

Earlier last year, Instagram took to Twitter to address some concerns the public expressed. While the major assumption was that you were only able to see 7% of those you follow, IG clarified:

See full tweet here

While an honest answer, this was as of 2019, it is 2020 and Instagram has since then, made updates, making it seemingly impossible for smaller influencers to get to a macro or celebrity influencer status, or for non-influencers to connect with the people close and in their circle.

Luckily there are ways to overcome the overcomplicated algorithm.

Be Present. Search Engine Watch suggests that one of the best ways to make sure your intended content gets seen is to remain present on the platform. Consistency is key when it comes to both your posting frequency and how often you’re engaging on your timeline.

Show Your Story. Literally. According to Sprout Social, posting Instagram stories can help enaggment tremendously. While they do not directly bump your post up on individual’s feed. they help keep you relevant in the mind’s of your followers and typically have a larger reach thansimply posting on a story.

Timing is everything. While Instagram spends months researching and experimenting with different algorithms before bringing it to the public, they don’t necessarily know your followers as intimate as you do. YOU know what time they are online based on patterns you may have watched meaning that you know when the best time to post is based on your followers. Aligning your posting time with the time that most are online will prove to help your numbers greatly.

While Instagram along with other platform’s algorithms may be frustrating, they are here to stay and likely change more. As opposed to succumbing to this frustrations, it is best learn and adapt accordingly, especially influencers mini and macro alike.

References:

4, D. R. on J., 2, D. R. on D., 7, D. R. on D., 2, D. R. on J., 4, D. R. on F., *, N., & Rodriguez, D. (2020, September 11). How I Beat The 2020 Instagram Algorithm & Gained 100K+ Followers. https://dani-the-explorer.com/2019-instagram-algorithm/.

Barnhart, B. (2020, October 5). How to survive (and outsmart) the Instagram algorithm in 2020. Sprout Social. https://sproutsocial.com/insights/instagram-algorithm/.

Miashkova, J. (2020, August 19). How to optimize for the Instagram algorithm in 2020. Search Engine Watch. https://www.searchenginewatch.com/2020/08/19/how-to-optimize-for-the-instagram-algorithm-in-2020/.

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Table Tennis Athletes: Advertising Beyond Public Diplomacy

What do these two pictures have in common?

Table tennis and Ai-chan, right!

So the question you probably have now is…

WHY TABLE TENNIS?

Table tennis is one the fastest racquet sports in the world and the response time towards the ball is one of the shortest as well. Table tennis is a sport that requires exceptional levels of alertness and reaction, while at the same time so much tactical skills, creativity, focus, inner drive, competitiveness, self-discipline is needed in order to succeed. Table tennis is a sport where the word “unpredictable” jumps at you at almost every side of the table. The dynamics of the sport are constantly changing and the skillsets required to up the game are always on the move, which makes it extremely difficult to survive in such environments. There are currently more than 164 million active players and about 250 million amateur players worldwide.  

The reason why I introduce table tennis is to examine how marketing communications has changed from being a tool for sports diplomacy 50 years ago, to having great potential in becoming an important means of advertising now, specifically in Asia.

AS SPORTS DIPLOMATS – HERE’S WHAT HAPPENED.

Table tennis was first used in the 1970s as a means to improve the United States-China relations, dubbed as the “Ping-Pong Diplomacy.” This was the first time that a US delegation was allowed into Beijing since the Communist party took over in 1949. The purpose of using table tennis to improve the US-Sino relations was to move away from using Cold War propaganda and to build something together looking towards the future. In 1971, the American table tennis team was invited for an all-expense paid trip to China at the 31st World Table Tennis Championships in Japan. Table tennis was a great example of the utilization of soft power, which is a persuasive approach to international relations, usually through economic and cultural influence.

TABLE TENNIS FACES IN ADVERTISEMENTS.

First things first, a celebrity athlete endorser is a “publicly recognised sports star which uses that public recognition to help another bolster the image of or sell specific goods and services” (Charbonneau, 2006).

Table tennis athletes are chosen on the basis that there can be enhanced consumer recognition and brand awareness to drive sales and have positive influence on the brand. Usually, most athletes that are selected are top ranked in the world, are physically attractive or are able to portray a sense of likeability and trustworthiness for the brand. The importance should be placed on the degree of perceived fit with the brand or product and the table tennis athlete. Therefore, while deciding if the specific table tennis player is suitable for the brand, there are three frameworks that can be applied before making a decision:

The first framework is the model of athlete brand image (MABI). There are three areas that need to be evaluated:

1. Athletic performance

2. Attractive appearance

3. Marketable lifestyle

The second framework is the TOPSTAR approach, which stands for:

1. Team

2. Off-field

3. Physical characteristics

4. Success

5. Transferability

6. Age

7. Reputation

The third framework focuses on the athlete as a form of a message source where six different aspects need to be examined:

1. Attention

2. Attitude towards the advertisement

3. Trustworthiness

4. Expertise

5. Aspirational Aspects

6. Meaning Transfer

To put things into context, let’s take a look at a few examples. The advertisements that are shown below check the boxes for either framework, which makes the athlete a successful choice for the brand.

For those who are not as familiar with table tennis, Fukuhara Ai (as shown in both examples) was one of the top ranked table tennis players in the world, winning a silver medal in the 2012 Olympics and a bronze medal in the 2016 Olympics with the Japanese national table tennis team. Although she has now retired, she still is the top choice for brands, especially within the Japanese and Taiwanese market. Her husband Chiang Hung Chieh (as shown in the picture on the left) is a national table tennis player from Taiwan.

Regarding the MABI framework, both Ai-chan and her husband are the cream of the crop in the table tennis industry and are deemed as two of the best looking athletes not only in the industry, but also across their respective national team representatives (Japan and Taiwan) in all sports. Recently, the pair participated in a Chinese variety show which promoted their happy family lifestyle, which led to a lot of viewers dubbing them as the “dream couple.” This also checks the third box of having a marketable lifestyle, so that the brand is able to use this for the audience to make associations with the ability of having such lifestyle. The picture of the left illustrates a picture of her and her husband being very happy with the baby and exactly depicts this image, which is correlated with the Panasonic air-conditioner that is being marketed.

This is also the same for other table tennis players from other countries in Asia, namely Yang Ha Eun from South Korea, Isabelle Li from Singapore and Xu Xin from China, where they are top-ranked in the world and are players, who citizens of the nation look up to, making them a good choice as a table tennis athlete endorser.

Also, from all the examples, it is evident that the potential of using table tennis athletes as endorsers in a marketing campaigns extends way beyond table tennis apparel brands. The brands that are presented here include:

  • Panasonic, a consumer electronics company from Japan
  • ANA, the largest airline in Japan
  • Shinhan Bank, one of the largest banks in South Korea
  • Milo, a beverage company prominent in Asia, Oceania, South America and parts of Africa
  • Li-Ning, a sports apparel brand from China

There is so much potential for table tennis athletes to reach into the world stage in terms of being an integral part of marketing communications for a brand and I look forward to seeing more brands reach out to table tennis athletes to work on different types and levels of collaborations in the future!

References

Antonovica, A., & Curiel, J. (2016). Sport celebrities multiple use in marketing messages: Example of the Spanish tennis player Rafael Nadal. Marketing and Branding Research, 3, 179-193.

Can ping-pong boost China’s soft power? (2010). Top Spin – Week In China, WiC 83.

Carter, T. F., & Sugden, J. (2011). The USA and Sporting Diplomacy: Comparing and Contrasting the Cases of Table Tennis with China and Baseball with Cuba in the 1970s. International Relations, 26(1), 101-121.

Charbonneau, J. (2006). The use of celebrity athletes as endorsers: Views of the New Zealand general public. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 326-333.

Desmarais, F. (2017). Who is the Athlete Endorser? A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Advertising Practitioners’ Views. Journal of Global Marketing, 30(1), 12-30.

Ha, L. (1997). Limitations and Strengths of Pan-Asian Advertising Media: A Review for International Advertisers. International Journal of Advertising, 16, 148-163.

Kahle, L. R., & Homer, P. M. (1985). Physical Attractiveness of the Celebrity Endorser: A Social Adaptation Perspective. The Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 954-961.

Kim, K. (2008). The effect of sports involvement, sponsor awareness, and corporate image on intention to purchase sponsors’ products. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 79-94.

Knoll, J., & Matthes, J. (2017). The effectiveness of celebrity endorsements: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45, 55-75.

Schubert, M., & Seyffert, J. (2017). Fan motives for interacting on social media – the example of the International Table Tennis Federation and Facebook. Current Issues in Sports Science, 2, 1-11.

Shuart, J. (2007). Heroes in Sport: Assessing Celebrity Endorser Effectiveness. International Journal of Sports Marketing & Sponsorship, 126-140.

Sports Diplomacy as a ‘Soft Power’ tool. (2014). Public Diplomacy and Global Communication.

Tsai, H. (2004). A study on the sponsorship strategy of athletes endorsement. A sponsorship case study of nu skin enterprise with table tennis player jing chen. Centro Esportivo Virtual.

Wang, B., Guo, W., & Zhou, C. (2016). Selective enhancement of attentional networks in college table tennis athletes: A preliminary investigation. PeerJ, 1-12.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Data Privacy: Disruption or Opportunity in Marketing Communication

Information is power, and personal data is money in the 21st century. There is an influx of new customers that are more than willing to give their personal data away at no cost to get rid of privacy banners and popups. This represents a marketing industry worth around $300 billion on personalized advertising from personal data collection (Anant, Donchak, Kaplan, & Soller, 2020). Demand for PII (personally identifiable information) marketing was real. It did not take long before many corporations were practicing unethical yet legal standards. No regulations were in place that covered data privacy as a whole until 2018 May when the European Union introduced GDPR. A federal data privacy law in the US is expected to arrive sometime in 2021-2022.

Privacy is no new subject to humankind. It was the 1970s when computers and ethernet became relevant to corporate America and individuals. The first Privacy Act and student privacy act, FERPA, were both signed into law in 1974 (Solove, 2006). Four years later, a financial privacy act, RFPA, was passed in 1978 (Solove, 2006). Moving forward twenty years where computers became common in homes, and corporate environments, the health privacy act, HIPAA regulation was enacted in 1996. Eleven years later, as the iPhone, a mobile computer that fits in a person’s hand, was introduced, a payment card industry compliance, PCI-DSS, brought new standards for merchants to follow (Wex, 2014). But it was not until 2018 when a data privacy law was introduced that encompassed all data, not a specific area of data.

Source: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/risk/our-insights/the-consumer-data-opportunity-and-the-privacy-imperative#

It should not come out as a surprise, then, that industries that held data privacy regulations ahead of time were able to achieve greater privacy standards and are reflected upon consumer trust level indicated in the charts above. HIPAA regulation for the health-related industry, RFPA/GLBA/FCRA/FACTA laws for financial services, and PCI-DSS compliance for retails all had significantly higher trust levels from consumers than sectors that did not regulate data privacy.

Data Privacy Relevancy in Marketing Communication

Many companies such as Facebook enjoyed exponential growth before a general awareness of data privacy came along, buying and selling personal data to maximize profit (Madrigal, 2012). It only has been two years when data privacy became a hot topic and less than four months that it meant anything in the US due to the California Consumer Privacy Act. When Cambridge Analytica blew up back in 2018, it took one year for Facebook to acknowledge “improper data-gathering practices” concerns, which speaks volumes on legality versus ethical consumerism (Wong, 2019).

Last two years, data privacy rose to the stage, and companies have responded to consumer concerns on how and what data companies collect (Price, 2020). Companies are aware that consumer trust directly relates to brand image, and practicing good data stewardship is the company’s statement of fidelity to their customers ( Afzal, Ali, Khan, Rehman, & Wajahat, 2009). Also, the fines slapped on Facebook for $5 billion from FTC and possibly $2.2 billion from EU GDPR would be a good encouragement for other companies that may violate handling customer’s data inappropriately (Huddleston, 2019).

There are a few common messages that resonate in every data privacy regulations, which are the following:

  1. Only collect and retain customer’s data that are an absolute necessity.
  2. Map the data collected from customers.
  3. State customer’s rights in the privacy policy in clear and simple terms.

The rest of the laws are similar in variations of strength, requirements, and qualifications. Marketing communications have evolved. Companies now have requirements depending on the location of consumers and its business to display privacy and cookie banners, along with non-passive double opt-ins, showing user rights and what the company does with the consumer’s data collected within the privacy policy, and may build features for consumers to manage own user data (TermsFeed, 2020). Applying data privacy standards into practice will build trust with consumers, which will ultimately increase the company’s brand reputation and the likelihood of continued business. It is only a matter of time when a federal data privacy law is introduced to cover all companies (Swanson, 2020). Lastly, the upside of adopting common data privacy standards, whether the company is required to or not, counts as due diligence, which will reduce liability significantly in terms of fines, and such marketing communication through interactions with the consumers by the website or in person will liken to formulate fiduciary relationship and increase the company’s brand value(ADCG, 2020).

References:

ADCG. (2020, February 11). The data fiduciary and escalating privacy standards. ADCG. Retrieved from https://adcg.org/the-data-fiduciary-and-escalating-privacy-standards/

Afzal, H., Ali, I., Khan, M., Rehman, K., Wajahat, S. (2009). Consumer’s trust in the brand: Can it be built through brand reputation, brand competence and brand predictability. International Business Research, 3 (1). DOI 10.5539/ibr.v3n1p43

Anant, V., Donchak, L., Kaplan, J., & Soller, H. (2020, April 27). The consumer-data opportunity and the privacy imperative. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/risk/our-insights/the-consumer-data-opportunity-and-the-privacy-imperative#

Huddleston, J. (2019, July 25). The FTC’s $5 billion fine for Facebook shows that the government can crack down on tech companies without crushing them. Business Insider. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-5-billion-fine-from-ftc-good-policy-opinion-2019-7

Madrigal, A. (2012, October 4). The surprising trajectory of Facebook’s growth to a billion users in 1 chart. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/10/the-surprising-trajectory-of-facebooks-growth-to-a-billion-users-in-1-chart/263259/

Price, R. (2020, August 17). Consumers believe that data privacy is a human right. Digital Content Next. Retrieved from https://digitalcontentnext.org/blog/2020/08/17/consumers-believe-that-data-privacy-is-a-human-right/

Solove, D. (2006). A brief history of information privacy law. Proskauer on Privacy, No. 215. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=914271

Swanson, B. (2020, May 15). What to watch for in federal data privacy legislation. Nextgov. Retrieved from https://www.nextgov.com/ideas/2020/05/what-watch-federal-data-privacy-legislation/165428/

TermsFeed. (2020, January 29). Are your marketing communications GDPR-compliant? Termsfeed. Retrieved from https://www.termsfeed.com/blog/gdpr-compliant-email-marketing/

Wex Inc. (2014, January 23). The history of PCI compliance. Retrieved from https://www.wexinc.com/insights/blog/corporate-payments-edge/history-pci-compliance/

Wong, J. (2019, March 21). Facebook acknowledges concerns over Cambridge Analytica emerged earlier than reported. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/mar/21/facebook-knew-of-cambridge-analytica-data-misuse-earlier-than-reported-court-filing

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Podcasts: Blazing the Path for Digital Advertising

Source: https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/the-best-podcasts-of-2020/

I have a confession… I’m addicted to podcasts. But it hasn’t always been that way. I used to ignore the Podcasts app on my smartphone because I didn’t know how to use it and wasn’t intrigued by the idea of listening to some strangers talk.

I only started listening because my boss kept texting me episodes of Pod Save America, which discussed politics (one of our favorite conversation topics). After listening to the first episode, I was immediately hooked. The hosts were entertaining, the content was informative, and what was most surprising: the ads were hilarious. I started viewing the ads as a perk of the show.

Fast forward three years and I’m accessing various podcasts on a daily basis. Regardless of the show, I’ve noticed that one thing is always consistent: the host interrupts the episode to briefly discuss a sponsor and usually includes a personal anecdote. In looking back, I’ve made several purchases based on these ads. How did that happen?

Podcasts Are Going Viral

To keep pace with ever-changing consumer habits, brands have increased their advertisements on online platforms (Kumar & Gupta, 2016). In the U.S. alone, digital ad spend is expected to reach $178 billion by 2024, an 87% increase from 2017 (Guttmann, 2020). This marketing mix primarily consists of social media, online banners, and search ads (Guttmann, 2020); however, this is shortsighted because it overlooks another valuable source: podcasts.

Today, podcasts are one of the fastest-growing digital audio formats (He, 2019). Smart brands have recognized this as a profitable method already; of 22 companies surveyed that used podcast ads, they reported a 34% revenue increase from the previous year which is expected to continue annually (He, 2019). Currently, a quarter of the U.S. population is listening to podcasts and monthly subscribers are forecasted to increase by 16% year-over-year, reaching 106.7 million listeners by 2024 (Benes, 2020). As a progressively popular media source, certain shows have likewise gained a cult following. This presents a distinctive opportunity to communicate with a highly engaged audience through a trusted voice: the podcast host.

Podcast Hosts Are the New Celebrity Influencers

Source: https://apnews.com/article/d9a5984297084be490fbbcfc026327e6

Listeners view the host of their favorite show as a dependable source of news, politics, lifestyle tips, etc. Therefore, when a host endorses a brand, listeners are far more likely to trust the information (Zolnikov, 2019). Coming from an intimate source, this is perceived as a word of mouth recommendation which is more reliable than any direct marketing from the brand itself (Berger, 2013). Additionally, a discount code is typically provided, giving the impression that listeners are privy to exclusive knowledge (Berger, 2013). This also prompts listeners to share this insider information and fund their social currency (Berger, 2013). As a result, brands are able to benefit from hosts the same way they would from celebrity influencers, a tactic that has been shown to be highly persuasive to consumers (Kumar & Gupta, 2016).

Don’t Underestimate the Power of the Podcast

Since its emergence in 2003, podcasts have skyrocketed in popularity and created a unique and potent advertising opportunity (Zolnikov, 2019). However, brands are still overlooking podcasts as an essential component of the marketing mix. In addition to offering personalized endorsements from trusted hosts, podcasts facilitate quick purchase decisions. Shows are typically accessed through a smartphone, so listeners are conveniently able to make an online purchase upon hearing a persuasive ad. In fact, a study of nearly 1,000 podcast listeners showed that 65% of participants were more willing to consider a brand that was sponsored in an episode (Zolnikov, 2019).

The other key benefit is the ability to provide relevant marketing—permanently embedded in the episode content—to a highly attentive audience (Zolnikov, 2019). Users generally don’t skip over the host’s testimonial the same way they would a television commercial or magazine ad (Zolnikov, 2019). The sponsorship cost is also far less than traditional advertising, which can be appealing to smaller businesses looking to increase brand awareness (Zolnikov, 2019).

The only caveat is that brands must convince a popular host to be a sponsor. Since hosts are endorsing the brand to loyal listeners and their reputation is on the line, they may not agree to the sponsorship unless they personally like the brand. This could be unnerving to large companies that are used to other types of media outlets fighting for the chance to advertise its name. But even if the power shifts when marketing through a podcast, the payoff to the brand can be well worth the abdication.

References:

Benes, R. (2020, September 9). US digital audio ad spending 2020: Examining radio, streaming audio, and podcast advertising opportunities amid the pandemic. eMarketer Inc. Retrieved from https://content-na1.emarketer.com/us-digital-audio-ad-spending-2020

Berger, J. (2013). Contagious: Why things catch on. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

Crooked Media. (2020). Pod Save America [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://crooked.com/podcast-series/pod-save-america/

Dove, J., & Jansen, M. (2020, July 18). The best podcasts of 2020. Digital Trends. Retrieved from https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/the-best-podcasts-of-2020/

Guttmann, A. (2020, August 27). Digital market outlook: Digital advertising spending in the U.S. 2017-2024, by format. Statista. Retrieved from https://www-statista-com.libproxy2.usc.edu/statistics/455840/digital-advertising-revenue-format-digital-market-outlook-usa/

He, A. (2019, July 12). Podcast advertising revenues will surpass $1 billion by 2021: New figures from the IAB and PwC show that podcasting presents a big opportunity to advertisers. eMarketer Inc. Retrieved from https://www.emarketer.com/content/podcast-advertising-revenue-will-surpass-1-billion-by-2021

Kumar, V., & Gupta, S. (2016). Conceptualizing the evolution and future of advertising. Journal of Advertising, 45(3), 302–317.

Pod Save America political podcast is coming to HBO. (2018, September 20). The Associated Press. Retrieved from https://apnews.com/article/d9a5984297084be490fbbcfc026327e6

Zolnikov, S. (2019, October 28). Should you sponsor a podcast? Hearst Bay Area. Retrieved from https://marketing.sfgate.com/blog/should-you-sponsor-a-podcast

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments