Responsibly Fit? Fitspo Influencers and Brand Liability

A recent article in Forbes titled 5 Steps To Take Before Starting An Influencer Marketing Campaign On Social Media highlights the benefits as well as cautions and advises brands on utilizing influencer marketing it their campaigns. “Influencer marketing can give your content a huge boost, and you can’t afford to ignore it,” says Andrey Slivka of Forbes. The article summarizes advice from Forbes’ social media editor Natasha Lewka with tips for including influencers as finding influencers with the greatest leverage on whichever platform (or platforms) your targeted audience is found. Then you target the right influencers, which don’t have to be huge celebrities to be successful, but can be “micro-influencers” defined by the article as someone with between 10,000 and 100,000 followers.

There are innumerable “micro-influencers” as well as many larger-reached influencers within the fitness industry. These fitspo models do everything from preach body positivity, share weight-loss and weightlifting transformations and more. Additionally, they align with specific workout programs and workout related brands, from active-wear companies to supplement companies and crossover brands. This industry has really seemed to capitalize on this area of marketing. Take U.K. based company Gym Shark for instance. They have an international roster of Gym Shark athletes who rep their clothing, attend conference meet ups and events, pop-up shops and other publicity efforts that have helped not only fuel the brand, but in turn, fuel the celebrity status of the influencers. It seems to be a win-win situation. As a result, many followers look to these influencers, most of which are not certified personal trainers, as being experts on fitness. And while there’s no denying they have mastered their own fitness and no doubt learned a lot about exercise and nutrition, they have to be careful to stipulate they are not experts with the information of certified personal trainers and nutritionists. And though many do become certified and make money offering their own personal training, many simply make their own work out guides and even products and sell them to followers. Sometimes there is flack for content these influencers create when talking about correct form for exercise or when they don’t talk about it. There is risk for someone to follow what they say to do and get hurt. Should these influencers be held more accountable for their health-related advice and influence? And what does that mean for the responsibility of the brands like Gym Shark to ensure the influencers they collaborate with are not ill-prepared to have followers immolate their fitness routines? Beyond that, what sort of protections should be in place for these brands AND these influencers. It seems only a matter of time before lawsuits increase.

References:

Slivka, A. (2018). 5 Steps to take before starting an influencer marketing campaign on     social media. Forbes. Retrieved from        https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescontentmarketing/2018/02/08/5-steps-to-take-before-   starting-an-influencer-marketing-campaign-on-social-media/2/#481e04633fac

Sponsorship. Gymshark. http://support.gymshark.com/hc/en-us/articles/207495946-Sponsorship

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

The Growing Multicultural Market

Yuriy Boykiv, co-founder and CEO of Gravity Media writes, “Multicultural marketing is no longer an option, but a necessity”. With the consumer market continuing to grow in diversity, it becomes more and more compelling for brands to establish authentic connections with ethnic groups. Those who recognize and respond to this growing market are included among the best brands in the world.

Although many critics say that this year’s Super Bowl commercials did not convey as much political statements and socially-conscious themes compared to previous years, there were a few brands that spoke about diversity. The Kraft 30-second ad was about diversity in family, showing kids with mixed heritage, gay couples and families with different ethnicities. T-Mobile went with a 60-second ad of babies of all different races with the narrator saying, “Some people may see your differences and be threatened by them”. The Toyota commercial featured four leaders of different religions going to the Super Bowl together in one car. Coca-Cola featured a 60-seconder commercial of people, young and old, of different backgrounds, cultural and otherwise, of varying likes and dislikes but all enjoy Coca Cola. While this year’s ad is less political in tone and treatment, it nonetheless effectively delivered the message of equality among people of various backgrounds – “…there’s a Coke for we and us and there’s a Coke for you”.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPi9nTE70aA

Championing diversity is not new for Coca-Cola. The “It’s Beautiful” commercial that aired in both 2014 and 2017 Super Bowl shows people of different ethnicities singing “America the Beautiful” in various languages. While this strong diversity message is designed to portray the multicultural make-up of the US population, it received widespread criticisms. The hashtag #BoycottCoke trended on Twitter for a while.

Regardless of how we feel toward the issue of diversity, numbers surrounding the growing multicultural market don’t lie. Consider the following statistics from a Nielsen study:

  • Thirty-eight percent of the U.S. population or 120 million people are African-American, Asian-American, and Hispanic consumers. These multicultural groups are projected to increase by 2.3 million each year.
  • The multicultural buying power has increased from $661 billion in 1990 to $3.4 trillion in 2014 – an exponential growth compared to the total U.S. buying power.
  • Multicultural groups comprise over 50 percent of the population in Hawaii, District of Columbia, California, New Mexico and Texas. Nevada, Maryland, Georgia, Arizona, Florida and New York.

Although many brands have embraced diversity, many marketing firms have yet to address the multicultural market. Those that ignore the increasing numbers of this segment of the population risk losing a big market share. Why do you think organizations resist the need for multicultural marketing?

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Why I’m Not Watching the Super Bowl, The NFL’s Big Problem

The groundhog has seen his shadow, chips and beer are on sale, and there’s nary a car on the road; it must be Super Bowl Sunday! In a world where I have been historically found at a friend’s house, enjoying a cold one, betting on outcomes, and enjoying everything from the Star Spangled Banner to the commercial breaks, this marks the fourth year in a row that I have opted out of the TV-centric activity. Why?

I can no longer glamorize a game that I fear my son will one day take interest in.

Ya, I know…some other school…

I’m a huge football fan. I was a cheerleader in high school before performing in the marching band and the university mascot in college. Four out of five of my brothers played football. We enjoy watching games on Sundays, and going to games whenever possible.

Now, however, I see the way my 3-year-old learns behaviors and norms from me. If I show my interest in photography, I can be certain I’ll find him playing with my lenses. My husband installed a ceiling fan, and our son now carries screws in his pocket and a toy drill with him. Interests and behaviors are learned, and mimicked by young children. If I watch football, my son watches football. If I enjoy the game, or cheer on a team, or shout “Ooooh!” after a big hit, so does my son. And if we keep watching games, someday he’ll look up at me and say, “I want to play football,” to which my husband and I are unified, “ABSOLUTELY NOT.” And I am not the only parent that feels this way.

The links between CTE (chronic traumatic encephalopacthy) and football players is striking. According to CNN, CTE was found in 99% of deceased football players brains’ that were donated for study. Ninety-nine percent. And, the longer you play football, the more likely you are to have CTE.

CTE, which can only be diagnosed by autopsy, is a degenerative disease caused by concussions and repeated hits to the head. Despite significant efforts to decrease the number of concussions in the NFL, 2017 saw a six-year high:

The Intercept created a film, “Concussion Protocol” which depicts all 281 of these violent collisions this year, and more importantly, the dazed confusion after. If you have five  minutes, it’s worth the watch:

The NFL is aware of the problem both for players and for ratings, and is doing its best to focus on player health. It continues to invest in concussion technology startups. However, this problem doesn’t start with the NFL. It starts much younger, with young men playing contact football as young as 6 – 8 years old, and suffering repeated hits through high school and university.

In 2015, a study in the journal Neurology found that former NFL players who began football before age 12 performed significantly worse on tests than those who started later in their teens. This held true even controlling for number of years played.

Indeed, two mothers in San Diego are suing Pop Warner and advocating a change in youth football after their sons separately committed suicide in their 20s after playing football only in their youth, and were later diagnosed with CTE. Illinois is writing legislation to ban tackle football before the age of 12. Yet, Pop Warner continues to fight for it’s right to tackle.

The violence of this contact sport and the extreme pervasiveness of injury are much of the reason I won’t let my son play, and part of preventing his interest is not watching and idolizing the profession, including the Super Bowl. And if he’s not watching, I’m not watching. This should be as big a problem for advertisers as it is for the NFL.

Today we went for a hike instead. I’ll catch up on the commercials tomorrow…maybe.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 11 Comments

Kid Internet Stars: Adorable or appalling?

I recently saw a video by a sassy and hilarious little girl sharing her feelings about about her mother signing her up for pre-school:

The girl, Mila Stauffer, is one of the newest child “stars” taking social media by storm.  With 3.4 million followers on Instagram account run by her mother Katie Stauffer, and more than 3 million views of the above video on Youtube, she is certifiably a viral star.  With Internet fame inevitably comes paid sponsorships and endorsement deals and Mila is no exception, doing paid partnerships with brands like Amazon, Thule Strollers and Volvo.  Mila’s mother acts as Mila’s manager and is the driving force behind Mila’s fame.  She has been so successful that she recently was able to quit her job and is now receiving a salary from the work Mila does (she says she puts the money in a trust for Mila, her twin sister Emma and her three older children).  

Mila’s mom is just one of a growing number of “sharents” on the Internet, defined as “a term to describe parents who actively share their kids’ digital identities online” (Stadmiller, 2017).  While it usually starts harmlessly — the mom of Ava Ryan posted a clip on Vine of her as a baby saying “I smell like beef” — once families start to realize monetary benefits, that can change.  Brands looking to tap into family friendly markets have begun to offer huge sums of money for sponsored videos, posts and experiences and now being the parent of an Internet star is a legitimate profession.

All this attention has led some to question the ethics of this model that thrusts children into the spotlight while advertisers reap the benefits, sometimes to their psychological detriment.  For example, YouTuber DaddyOFive recently lost custody of two of his children after people started taking issue with his cruel pranks often aimed at his 9 year old and 12 year old that involved him yelling in their faces or purposely making them cry.  According to UNICEF, one in four kids indicated that their parents’ online sharing made them feel anxious, sad, embarrassed or worried and nearly fifty percent of all images shared on pedophile sites are taken from social media sites.  Not to mention that unlike traditional third party child star situations where there are rules about what must be done with the money and limits on how much children can work, the waters are murkier when their parents are running the show.  Additionally, the Internet can be a cruel place and putting kids out in such a fashion can invite extreme criticism, pedophiles or unsavory characters could be putting their mental health or even their physical health at risk.  This unfettered child labor has made some parenting groups and psychologists nervous about the longterm effects of being a viral video start.  Unfortunately, it’s just too early to tell.

So, given these statistics, what does that mean for advertisers looking to take advantage of this new wealth of kid influencers?  Working with Internet stars is enticing for brands because they usually have well-defined personalities, built in established audiences and are guaranteed to draw views.  However, there is clearly a seedy underbelly to this world where it’s not always clear that this is in the best interests of the children. As the New York Times put it, it is now a common question to ask “Why isn’t your toddler paying the mortgage?”

What do you all think? Do you think there should be laws or limits on these types of sponsored postings? Do you think this is much ado about nothing? Share your thoughts in the comments!

References

Luscombe, B. (2017, May 18). The YouTube Parents Who are Turning Family Moments into Big Bucks. Time. Retrieved from www.time.com

Rosman, K. (2017, September 27). Why Isn’t Your Toddler Paying the Mortgage? New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com

Smidt, R. (2018, January 25). Heres What Its Like To Have A Toddler Who Is Famous On Instagram. Retrieved from https://www.buzzfeed.com/remysmidt/mila-emma-katie-stauffer?utm_term=.mvBDZx6VD#.blxQmz7DQ

Stadtmiller, M. (2017, December 24). Kids Don’t Have Parents Anymore-They Have ‘Sharents’. Retrieved from https://www.thedailybeast.com/kids-dont-have-parents-anymorethey-have-sharents

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

“Give it to me I’m worth it”?

No one can argue that football has become a religious Sunday holiday for many households in America. When the Super Bowl is underway this coming Sunday, many audiences will tune in to the game even though their favorite team or athlete(s) is not playing. For those who aren’t interested in the game, the commercials are exciting to watch and for some, it may be even more fun to watch than the actual game itself. Millions of people anticipate what brand will stand out and what company will have the best and funniest commercials for the water cooler talk at work on Monday. Some of the known brands for viewers to anticipate are ads from Budweiser and Coca-Cola, while other brands such as Doritos and Pepsi are looking to make a comeback for 2018 (Michaels, 2018). There will be many brands fighting for the attention of over 100 (110 est.) million viewers (Orszag, 2018).

The price of advertisement on Super Bowl Sunday is ridiculously high at a minimum of $5 million for a 30-second spot (Spross, 2018). That’s a jump from $2 million just in 2002, and at $4.5 million in 2015 (Spross, 2018). The cost continues to climb and it makes one think as a brand, is it really worth it? At what cost will the investment of the Super Bowl ad will be reciprocated? One of the reasons for the uphill in cost is that the Super Bowl is a social event and in a digital era, it is a live event that can’t be fast forward or viewers skipping through the commercials (Spross, 2018). However, if this cost continues to go up, will the value of ad be profitable for the 30-second spot? At this point, I don’t believe that it’s not worth the money, but that’s not what the NFL wants advertisers to think. I have to give it to the NFL for believing that they are worth it. 

Fifth Harmony, Worth It ft. Kid Ink, Reflection

 

Economists did conduct a study of ads for films that aired during the Super Bowl between 2004 and 2014 (Orszag, 2018). In their research of 70 films, the results were an $8.4 million increase in revenue from ticket sales that does not include sales from the opening week (Orszag, 2018). The success is due to Studios expectation of commercial box office success (Orszag, 2018). Thus, only movies that studios knew would generate a high volume of ticket sales are aired during Super Bowl slot such as summer blockbuster. Measuring the effectiveness of ads on brands, on the other hand, is extremely difficult. According to marketing experts on a recent survey, ads during Super Bowl cost is less effective because the ads don’t translate directly into increased sales or consumers intent to purchase (Orszag, 2018). However, economists argue that ads do pay for themselves and are more effective than what marketing experts claimed. Ads that run in the cities of the team has a 20 percent more viewership than other cities (Orszag, 2018). Of course, no one knows what team or cities will be in the Super Bowl because ad spot is purchased in advance (Bloomberg). Another reason ads work because beer and sodas have high consumption rate during the game (Orszag, 2018).

So based on the research done, it still seems that the benefit still does not outweigh the cost. It only works for specific circumstances such as beer since many people drink during the game. There are no overwhelming results that the cost for an ad will translate into dollars for a brand. The game has already decreased by 10 percent viewership this year alone (Spross, 2018). So why do the cost of ads still going up? The ticket sales are already steep enough and the NFL is making money in merchandise and concession. So why do advertisers still want the spot when they know that the likelihood of investment may not be worth air time. Do they still believe that the more exposure the brand gets, the greater the chances of profitability?

References:

 

Michaels, M. (2018, January 25). The price of a 30-second Super Bowl ad has exploded – but it may be worth it for companies. Retrieved February 04, 2018, from http://www.businessinsider.com/super-bowl-commercials-cost-more-than-eagles-quarterback-earns-2018-1

 

Orszag, P. R. (2018, January 31). Some Super Bowl Ads Are Worth the Price. Retrieved February 04, 2018, from https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-01-31/some-super-bowl-ads-are-worth-the-price

Spross, J. (2018, February 02). Are Super Bowl ads really worth $5 million? Retrieved February 04, 2018, from http://theweek.com/articles/752440/are-super-bowl-ads-really-worth-5-million

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

The Age of Influencer Marketing

In 2018, marketers are faced with the continual challenge to make their campaigns innovative and effective. Our world today is filled with so many different options to consume content, that the biggest challenge in marketing is no longer what your campaign will consist of, but where it will be seen. Since more and more people have moved away from traditional methods of advertising (newspaper ads, radio spots, or TV commercials), marketers have had to discover new ways of engaging their users while still exposing their content (Ward, 2017).

To solve this issue, the first thing marketers must do is find out where their users spend a majority of their time. In recents years, the amount of time customers spend on social media versus TV or radio has increased drastically (Molla, 2017). Since this is the new normal, companies are now left to do one thing: bring their content directly to users on their social sites.

Within the last year, it has been seen that one of the most effective ways for brands to expose their content on social media is through social media influencers (Jackson, 2018). The term “social media influencer” is a relatively new phrase, however it is highly effective for describing this type of marketing. Essentially it works like this:

  1. Company determines that their brand will do well with the specific influencer’s following
  2. Brand partners with a social media personality (usually one with a large following)`
  3. Brand gives the influencer the product to demonstrate or compensation to post about the item
  4. Brand receives more business due to the ad (GroupHigh, 2017)

This method of advertising has proven to be very effective for a multitude of reasons, but perhaps the most prominent is that the followers trust who they are following. If someone is already actively following an influencer’s post, they obviously have some sort of interest in their content. If that influencer then tells their followers about a great new product they are using (even if they were paid to do so), their followers will likely trust their opinion and be more inclined to purchase the product (Lee, 2018). Additionally, this method of advertising is often much more cost efficient than traditional methods such as TV commercials (Lee, 2018). While a commercial may run a company millions of dollars to produce and distribute, an influencer ad can be as little as sending the influencer free product, to a few thousand dollars for a post. The rates at which influencers are compensated varies greatly on their following or the product being offered. However in any case, it is much cheaper than the traditional methods of marketing.

While this method is becoming more widely accepted amongst brands, it still has mixed reviews amongst social media users. Many people feel that the ads they consistently see by their favorite instagrammers is disturbing their content. Personally, I don’t mind influencer ads because it gives me a chance to see the product in use and hear from someone who has used it.

I would love to hear your thoughts on this though! How do you feel about social media influencers? Do you find their ads to be effective? Have you ever purchased something because someone you follow posted an ad for it? Let me know!

References:

G. (n.d.). Social Media Influencers – Find and build relationships. Retrieved February 03, 2018, from https://www.grouphigh.com/social-media-influencers/

Jackson, D. (2018, January 31). Top 8 Influencer Marketing Trends for 2018. Retrieved February 03, 2018, from https://sproutsocial.com/insights/influencer-marketing/

Lee, K. (2018, January 12). 2018: Year of the Influencer or year of the influencer      marketing implosion? Retrieved February 03, 2018, from https://marketingland.com/2018-year-influencer-year-influencer-marketing-implosion-231617

Molla, R. (2017, October 09). Americans are spending more time on media thanks to multitasking. Retrieved February 03, 2018, from https://www.recode.net/2017/10/9/16447820/americans-time-spent-media-multitasking-emarketer

Ward, T. (2017, December 02). The Influencer Marketing Trends That Will Dominate 2018. Retrieved February 03, 2018, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomward/2017/12/01/the-influencer-marketing-trends-that-will-dominate-2018/#4ada36a25398

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

It’s Jingle Time Once Again


Shiney Hiney Song YouTube – Charmin

Listen. Do you hear that?

My hiney so Charmin shiny.

Yes, it’s the newest product jingle that pops into your head at the most inappropriate times or we sing the catchy chorus while people look at us with a puzzled face. Unless they too, have been consumed by the “earworm.”

Brands are challenged to cut through a lot of clutter these days and to break through, brands want the power of a jingle. According to a recent Forbes article, it’s getting harder and harder to make an impression on a consumers within a 30-second time slot. If your brand has a catchy jingle that sticks, the consumer will share it the for the rest of the day. Thus, delivering far more reach and frequency than the original spot.

Jingles are so powerful people can recall a phone number or slogan, years after the commercial has aired. While talking to a coworker about jingles, he smiled.

“I remember a jingle from my childhood,” he said, then breaking into a jingle about a local heating and air company even recited the phone number.

Some of the most memorable jingles have come from  Kit Kat, Folger’s, and Bandaid. Jingles in advertisements were widely used between 1998 and 2011, but started to fade in use for a couple of reasons. The first reason was due to the rising trend of licensing popular music for ads. And the second reason was the negative stigma associated with them due to many consumers seeing them as “cheesy.”

Where jingles have the most leverage, however, is on radio. An Ad Age article gives story after story on how jingles deliver the brand a personality and a vibe through words and music.

Do I have you interested? Want to make an earworm for a campaign you are working on? Here are some of the key components to making a successful jingle.

  • Research your target audience to determine what will appeal to them
  • Choose the mediums you plan to advertise on (radio, television, Website, social media, and etc.)
  • Determine the topic you want to discuss in the jingle (2-3 main points)
  • From those points start creative writing that involves rhyming with a compelling story
  • Choose music you want to mess with the rhyme to give the product the personality you want to achieve
  • Create your commercial :60 radio spot, :30 television spot or even :10-:15 bookend for radio and television

Hope you find success in your jingle journey, or at least now know “My Hiney so Charmin Shiny.”

References

Passman, J. (2017, May 30). Why advertising jingles will make a comeback.  Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/jordanpassman/2017/05/30/why-advertising-jingles-will-make-a-comeback/#7ed53d511b2e

AdAge Staff (2017, February 8). The power of the jingle. Retrieved from http://adage.com/article/iheart-media/power-jingle/307801/

Rongione, D. (ND). How to make a commercial jingle for a school project. Retrieved from http://classroom.synonym.com/make-commercial-jingle-school-project-8527836.html

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

About-Face: Time to rethink your Facebook marketing strategy

Recently, Facebook’s CEO announced platform changes that will reduce News Feed content from businesses, brands and media to better connect users with friends and family.  According to Zuckerberg, Facebook is focused on improving the experience by “helping users find relevant content to have more meaningful social interactions.”  This change comes in response to community feedback and research analysis to continue making the social network an engaging platform.

While research from Social@Ogilvy estimated that the organic reach of branded content was already less than 2%, this new algorithm change has led to speculation and concern about the impact to brand marketers.  Social media is still a critical component for integrated marketing communications plans, so how can we prepare?  Here are some considerations for your marketing strategy:

Content Calendar

The good news is that marketers will be able to decrease the frequency of publishing on Facebook since organic content will not be seen by page followers.  This will save creative resources needed to maintain daily content calendars.  Some content will still be needed for page visitors.  However, resources could be prioritized on creating engaging and quality content for dark posts to increase relevance to audiences.

Ad Spend

Advertising costs on Facebook have been relatively inexpensive compared to traditional and search advertising.  Facebook ads operate on an auction system where advertisers compete for space based on factors like audience targeting, placement, relevance, and timing.  As brands continue to compete for limited audience attention, these changes will decrease the available ad space and increase the cost for promoted content.  This means that brands will need to allocate additional budget for Facebook advertising or find alternative channels for promotion.

Community Engagement

Because Facebook is committed to providing relevant content to users, the platform will continue to display posts that audiences will want to see.  This means that engagement will help increase a post’s ranking in the News Feed.  For marketers, this means that it will be more important to understand the needs of their target audiences and create content that engages these individuals.  Engagement also happens through comments and shares, so marketers should encourage conversation by participating in conversations on the comment threads of brand posts.

Alternatives for Content Distribution

There will continue to be interest in news stories and content that entertains or adds value to users.  Facebook’s News Feed changes will not stop people from seeking out this content, but this may result in users seeking alternative sources for this information.  Knowing this may cause behavioral changes, marketers may want to adjust their integrated marketing communication plans to identify new ways to distribute content.  For example, BuzzFeed started running ads on Facebook to direct audiences to use the company’s mobile app instead of Facebook.  And, The New York Times is looking at ways to integrate virtual reality into their content distribution strategy.

This isn’t the first or last time that social networks will alter their platforms.  Change is always scary, but this isn’t the end of the world for marketers.  It is simply an opportunity to try something new.  Brands who develop a relationship and build trust with consumers will continue to win.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Living Abroad: Safe or Not?

I’ve been having a hard time sleeping lately. After graduation in May I will be leaving for one year on a backpacking trip around the world. I’m worried about securing places to sleep at an affordable price while not sacrificing too much around quality, service, and safety. You’d think that I would be making the most of the time I have left in my own bed and in my own home, but I’ve been struggling to lay my head down to rest without knowing where I’ll rest for the next year. Thankfully, hostels and hostel services have started to take notice of this concern that I and many other travelers on a budget have and they’ve begun to take action.

Hostels often have negative perceptions associated with them. Recent stories worldwide include travelers staying in hostels being attacked by other travelers, discrimination against travelers from hostel managers, and drug fueled parties ending in hospital stays. While interpersonal disputes and things out of the control of travelers often cause much of these issues, hostels and services that help travelers find hostels have been charged with projecting a positive image in order to drive business.

Hostelworld, a travel brand that allows travelers to search for a place to stay based on destination, is leading the way. The company reevaluated its priorities in 2017 and made the customer the center of all decisions. Hostelworld knows that marketing towards travelers is increasingly moving towards mobile devices and it is staying ahead of the curve. This included upgrading its mobile app to include a notice board where travelers can interact with hostels prior to their stay. In addition to this, intercultural barriers like language have been broken down by the addition of a translation feature to the Hostelworld app that allows guests to communicate with other guests from around the world. These features undoubtedly would make any traveler, including myself, feel a little more comfortable with staying in hostels. The company even replaced its chief marketing officer role with a chief customer officer position so that any marketing communications are made with travelers in mind. And the changes seem to have helped. Hostelworld saw a 6% increase in total bookings in 2017 and it predicts continued success in the coming year.

While the safety of a traveler staying at a hostel ultimately comes down to how the dwelling is managed, travel sites like Hostelworld can do a lot to inform an individual prior to a trip. With a customer centric approach to marketing, I certainly feel more confident in where I’ll stay over the next year. I know that this is a company that cares about those that use its service and is willing to help make the best living situation decisions possible. That’s all anybody can ask for when finding a home away from home.

Now I want to know what you prefer!

If you use travel services, what are you drawn to in using one company over another?

What do those company’s do to create a connection with you and build enough trust up to make trip plans?

 

References:

Erwin, A. (2018, January 3). Belfast woman accused of throwing knife and pizza at fellow hostel resident. Belfast Telegraph. Retrieved from https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/belfast-woman-accused-of-throwing-knife-and-pizza-at-fellow-hostel-resident-36455934.html

Gwynn, S. (2018, January 11). Kristof Fahy joins Hostelworld as customer chief. Campaign. Retrieved from https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/kristof-fahy-joins-hostelworld-customer-chief/1454157

Hadar, S. (2018, January 14). Uruguayan hostel sued over refusal to admit Israeli couple. Ynet. Retrieved from https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-5071035,00.html

Hobbs, T. (2017, November 6). Hostelworld: Young marketers must play a bigger role in shaping brand purpose. Marketing Week. Retrieved from https://www.marketingweek.com/2017/11/06/generation-exchange-hostelworld/

Percival, G. (2018, January 25). Hostel group sees bookings rise 6%. Irish Examiner. Retrieved from https://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/business/hostel-group-sees-bookings-rise-6-824656.html

Powell, G. & Carmody, J. (2018, January 3). Nine hospitalized in suspected mass overdose at backpacker house in Perth; two critical. ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-01-03/nine-rushed-to-hospital-for-suspected-drug-overdose/9300448

Rogers, C. (2018, January 11). Hostelworld ramps up customer focus as it appoints Kristof Fahy as CCO. Marketing Week. Retrieved from https://www.marketingweek.com/2018/01/11/hostelworld-ramps-up-customer-focus/

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

Brands and Politics: A Match Made in Heaven or Hell?

Have you ever bought something, switched brands, or stopped using a product because of a company’s stance (or lack thereof) on a cause you cared about?

Chances are over half of you answered yes – no matter where in the world you live. A 2017 study from communications firm Edelman found that half of all global consumers are belief-driven buyers, with that number as high as 60% for Millennials and even higher in developing markets like China and India. With that statistic in mind, it should be no surprise that experts are predicting another political surge in this year’s Super Bowl ads. This is in spite of a highly divisive American political climate and mixed results following last year’s attempts by companies like Audi, who spoke out on equal pay for equal work, and Budweiser, who addressed immigration.

The Key is Authenticity 

All of this begs the question: is it really a good idea to mix brands and politics, and furthermore, is it worth the risks? This question is complex and merits a great deal of consideration, but I believe that the answer fundamentally lies in one key ingredient: authenticity. Brands that align themselves with a cause in a way that connects their values and their actions – all while demonstrating a true understanding of what’s important to their customers – have much to gain from this strategy. The catch is, supporting causes with genuine authenticity is no easy feat for a for-profit company, and botched attempts bring the risk of backlash and consumer distrust.

The Wrong Approach 

Let’s look at Starbucks for an example of how difficult it can be for brands to demonstrate the level of authenticity that the public demands. Often praised for their active participation in cultural conversations over the years, the coffee company found itself in hot water during one such attempt in 2015. You may remember the #RaceTogether campaign, which directed Starbucks baristas to write these words on coffee cups in an effort to facilitate conversations about race relations in the United States. Despite the company’s attempt to align this approach with their mission to “inspire and nurture the human spirit” over conversation and coffee, Starbucks faced a backlash as the public perceived this campaign as a presumptuous and arrogant belief that a subject as nuanced and complex as race relations could be guided by baristas in a coffee to-go line. Whether company leaders were genuine in their desire to help is besides the point; consumers saw the move as utterly inauthentic to the Starbucks brand and the company’s role in society. Starbucks abruptly ended the campaign after just 6 days.

There’s No Going Back 

It would be easy to see failures like this #RaceTogether attempt or Pepsi’s botched Kendall Jenner commercial and decide that the safest path for a brand is to avoid aligning with any political or social causes (which is the approach that most companies took for a long time). But this avoidance, too, now comes with its own set of risks. As influential advisor and CEO of BlackRock Larry Fink recently remarked in an open letter to the business community, “To prosper over time, every company must not only deliver financial performance, but also show how it makes a positive contribution to society.” As business leaders buzz over this statement – and the change it may drive given Fink’s power and influence – shoppers are increasingly voting with their wallets through boycotts on products and services from Uber to Keurig to L.L.Bean.

Learning From the Success Stories 

Meanwhile, companies who are able to communicate their point of view on important issues of the day without contradicting or misunderstanding their mission, values, and defined role in society are reaping the benefits. See brands like Patagonia, who recently took a bold stance on President Trump’s decision to remove protections on public lands; REI, who came out against the harms of materialism through their #OptOutside campaign and decision to close their stores on Black Friday; and Proctor & Gamble’s The Talk campaign, which focused on celebrating diversity and creating dialogue around black beauty. Though each of these companies may have angered certain subgroups, the success of each demonstrates that the companies took the time and effort to be sure the message would resonate with their core customers while bringing to life the values they have consistently espoused through beliefs, words, and actions. The result? These brands have the chance to advance causes they care about while generating positive buzz and bringing their community closer together. Win, win, win. Now let’s cheer for brands to succeed in these efforts come Super Bowl Sunday!

References:
Bedat, M. & Shank, M. (2017, April 5). Every purchase you make is a chance to vote with your wallet. Fast Company. Retrieved from https://www.fastcompany.com/40402079/every-purchase-you-make-is-a-chance-to-vote-with-your-wallet
Budweiser: Born the hard way. (2017, February 5). AdAge. Retrieved from http://adage.com/videos/budweiser-born-the-hard-way/1266
Earned Brand 2017. Edelman. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.edelman.com/earned-brand 
Mission Statement. Starbucks. Retrieved from https://www.starbucks.com/about-us/company-information/mission-statement 
Nudd, T. (2017, November 20). Inside year three with #OptOutside with REI’s chief creative officer. AdWeek. Retrieved from http://www.adweek.com/creativity/inside-year-three-of-optoutside-with-reis-chief-creative-officer/
Oster, E. (2017, July 25). Parents have ‘the talk’ in the powerful ‘my black is beautiful’ campaign from P&G. AdWeek. Retrieved from http://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/parents-have-the-talk-in-powerful-my-black-is-beautiful-campaign-from-pg/
Riley, C. (2018, January 16). Wall Street titan to CEOs: It’s not just about the money. CNN Money. Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2018/01/16/investing/blackrock-larry-fink-social-responsibility/index.html
Schultz, E.J. (2017, February 5). Audi – Daughter. AdAge. Retrieved from http://adage.com/videos/audi-daughter/1268 
Schultz, E.J. (2017, April 6). After Kendall Jenner ad debacle, what’s next for Pepsi? AdAge. Retrieved from http://adage.com/article/cmo-strategy/kendall-jenner-ad-debacle-pepsi/308587/
Stern, N. (2017, December 5). Patagonia gets political: A new era of retail activism? Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilstern/2017/12/05/patagonia-gets-political-a-new-era-of-retail-activism/#1a2b169c4f94
Taylor, K. (2015, March 17). Why the Starbucks ‘Race Together’ campaign is bad for business. Entrepreneur. Retrieved from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/244035 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments